1. 14:19 12th Apr 2013

    Notes: 10

    Tags: long reads

    H/t to David Malki ! for linking this in a Wondermark post. Let me describe this in the one way I haven’t seen anyone describe it yet: this is a Ms Scribe story for a literary scholar and memoirist in the 1970s and 1980s, except it didn’t work out for him. It is fascinating.

    (And because I’m paranoid, yes, I fact-checked some of the claims of the article and didn’t come up against anything obviously fraudulent.)

     
  2. I can’t find a good pullquote for this article, but it’s a really nice brief overview of the last two hundred years in prosthetic technology. It is, indeed, pretty fascinating how war drives medical tech—not just because there are a greater number of people who need the technology, but because there are a greater number of doctors and engineers who need the technology. The pictures are particularly great:

    Left, intended as a two-week substitute, this leg was ultimately used for 40 years, requiring many home repairs by its roof-thatcher owner. Right, a father constructed this limb for his 3-year-old son in 1903, possibly from a wooden chair leg. Images courtesy of the Science Museum / SSPL.”

     
  3. 11:15 12th Mar 2013

    Notes: 19

    Reblogged from lareviewofbooks

    Tags: book reclong reads

    lareviewofbooks:

T. Clutch Fleischmann argues that it might be a little early to title a book on the history of the gay rights movement “Victory”:

Standing in contrast to this diverse history is Linda Hirshman’s Victory: The Triumphant Gay Revolution, a recent accounting of the gay rights movement in the United States. The choice to title such a book Victory while queer people continue to fight for basic rights and safety is a good indication of Hirshman’s scope.

Click here to read of Fleischmann’s review of Linda Hirshman’s Victory.

This is really good and even more incisive than the pullquote indicates. It also offers recommendations of queer history that does the job much better (which I haven’t read): Michael Bronski’s A Queer History of the United States and Susan Stryker’s Transgender History.
(h/t ourlightsinvain’s gmail away message :p )

    lareviewofbooks:

    T. Clutch Fleischmann argues that it might be a little early to title a book on the history of the gay rights movement “Victory”:

    Standing in contrast to this diverse history is Linda Hirshman’s Victory: The Triumphant Gay Revolution, a recent accounting of the gay rights movement in the United States. The choice to title such a book Victory while queer people continue to fight for basic rights and safety is a good indication of Hirshman’s scope.

    Click here to read of Fleischmann’s review of Linda Hirshman’s Victory.

    This is really good and even more incisive than the pullquote indicates. It also offers recommendations of queer history that does the job much better (which I haven’t read): Michael Bronski’s A Queer History of the United States and Susan Stryker’s Transgender History.

    (h/t ourlightsinvain’s gmail away message :p )

     
  4. It’s strange. I’ve only ever managed to enjoy anything when I began to let go of the idea of happiness. I’m not arguing against happiness here (though I have made attempts to do so elsewhere), and I won’t claim that happiness is undesirable (a claim that I do not yet have a coherent opinion on). But, I do believe for certain that the idea of happiness, the expectation of happiness, is damaging. In an environment where we are constantly told how happy we are, happiness has become an imperative.

    It would be tedious to compile a list of emotions allowed on campus to prove my point. What I can do quickly is say that I know that there are certain things that I, as a student, am not supposed to feel here, certain things that are supposedly at odds with my identity as a student.

    One of those things has been grief.

    Faye Wang’s piece on mental health in the Claremont Colleges hit home for me.

     
  5. 14:52 3rd Jan 2013

    Notes: 4

    Reblogged from nextian

    Tags: long reads

    nextian:

    What kind of food? High-protein packs?

    No, not mountaineering-type stuff. All I had was a bunch of sandwiches wrapped in foil from the Galley. It was a motley collection of clothes and food, a little bit of rope, crampons, and an ice axe that I didn’t use. I didn’t have a tent. I had no idea what was going to happen, and I didn’t have access to real mountaineering gear, so it was just a collection of what I thought I might use.

    So what happened at tee-off time?

    I took off on Saturday night, about 9 o’clock, while everybody was getting drunk. Before, during the work week, I had driven out and filled up the snowmobile gas tank, and got another five-gallon jerry can and put that on. I caught the shuttle to Scott Base, went out to the snowmobiles, threw the backpack in, fired it up and went down the peninsula. I remember thinking, “Oh my god, this is absolutely ridiculous. Why am I even attempting this?” You get further out and you get more and more committed.

    I went back to tag some old entries, and this link was dead, so I’ve replaced it here.

    Mount Erebus is in Antarctica. Big Dead Place is The Single Website that assembles what sometimes seems like all of the stories, jokes, survival guides, and photography of the English-speaking missions to Antarctica. It is incredible. So is this story!

    “Douglas Moeson” is a legendary figure in the lore of The Program because in 1991 he ascended to the peak of Mount Erebus by his slight technical skills, his pro-active disregard of local policies, and with a bag of sandwiches from the Galley.

     
  6. So here’s something interesting: the Oxford American published a fact-checker hating on The Lifespan of a Fact. Now, I have not read the Lifespan of a Fact, so I am not in any way defending it, but part of the fact-checker’s basic premise here is: come on, this isn’t cultural criticism, this is rhetorically empty self-examination; why should anyone not a sausage-maker care about the sausage-making?

    The answer is, we care about it because it’s fucking terrible, because you’re making us terrible fucking sausages.

    And I know that because he says, and I quote, “Procopius was the preeminent historian of his time and place, and from his books we know that it was an improbably interesting time and place to have lived in. He wrote under the reign of Justinian—of the Justinian Code—and Empress Theodora—a pretty universally feared and despised former prostitute.”

    This is a guy who works for what he calls “the most accurate magazine in America” calling Theodora universally feared and despised.

    None of the facts in The Secret History contradict anything written in the plain old History.

    Including the part where Justinian is literally a demon, and his head disappears?

    The interesting thing here, for our purposes, is that Procopius wrote two different histories of the same time—one of which totally contradicts the spirit of the other—and that an impartial fact-checker would have signed off on them both.”

    If an impartial fact-checker would have signed off on the Secret History, keeping in mind that, in this guy’s own estimation, a fact-checker is there to prevent a publisher from getting sued for libel and make the writer look good, is it any fucking wonder that we don’t understand why fact-checkers do the things they do?

     
  7. oldtimefamilybaseball:

    It’s no secret that I feel ‘feelings’ for Fire Joe Morgan. Besides being the first internet webzone that combined sports with actual humor, it’s probably what firmly got me into the statistical revolution. Because as an 18 year old entering college, I was a baseball fan inasmuch that I loved baseball, thought Billy Beane’s computertech was trying to ruin the game, and bunts were man’s best friend.

    And then I went to college where, along with the helpful, insistent prodding of my sabermetrically inclined roommate (an amazing feat at Emerson College), and his recommendation of Fire Joe Morgan, everything came together in a spark of light. Though my love of the bunt has never changed. 

    When FJM shuttered their operations four years ago, probably because all that sweet Fremulon money dried up, there was a gaping hole in my soul. Today, at The Classical, Ken Tremendous, Dak, and Junior return to talk about their legacy. And wouldn’t you know it, even Brandon McCarthy was a fan: 

    “And occasionally that nerd would be someone like Brandon McCarthy, who wrote us years ago, when nobody knew who he was. He was just a fan of the site, and he was pitching for the Rangers at the time. And he became a big fan of the site, and would write us all the time, and would tell us stories that we frankly can’t repeat. And we went and saw him when they played the Angels, and stuff. We keep in touch with him, and he came by Parks recently, after he got hit in the head. He’s better now.”

    Part one of three is up now, and I advise you to check it out and then come back the next day. After all the hours of enjoyment that Fire Joe Morgan gave us, isn’t that the least you could do? 

     
  8. How could you go ahead of me?

    lettersofnote:



    In April of 1988, shortly after excavating an ancient tomb in Andong City, South Korea, archaeologists were stunned to find the coffin of Eung-Tae Lee — a 16th-century male, now mummified, who, until his death at the age of 30, had been a member of the ancient Goseong Yi clan. Resting on his chest was the following moving letter, written by his pregnant widow and addressed to the father of their unborn child. Also found in the tomb, placed beside his head, were the sandals pictured above, woven from hemp bark and his distraught wife’s own hair.

    Translated transcript follows.

    (Source: Archaeological Institute of America, via John Johnson; Image of sandals via.)


    Transcript
    To Won’s Father

    June 1, 1586

    You always said, “Dear, let’s live together until our hair turns gray and die on the same day.” How could you pass away without me? Who should I and our little boy listen to and how should we live? How could you go ahead of me?

    How did you bring your heart to me and how did I bring my heart to you? Whenever we lay down together you always told me, “Dear, do other people cherish and love each other like we do? Are they really like us?” How could you leave all that behind and go ahead of me?

    I just cannot live without you. I just want to go to you. Please take me to where you are. My feelings toward you I cannot forget in this world and my sorrow knows no limit. Where would I put my heart in now and how can I live with the child missing you?

    Please look at this letter and tell me in detail in my dreams. Because I want to listen to your saying in detail in my dreams I write this letter and put it in. Look closely and talk to me.

    When I give birth to the child in me, who should it call father? Can anyone fathom how I feel? There is no tragedy like this under the sky.

    You are just in another place, and not in such a deep grief as I am. There is no limit and end to my sorrows that I write roughly. Please look closely at this letter and come to me in my dreams and show yourself in detail and tell me. I believe I can see you in my dreams. Come to me secretly and show yourself. There is no limit to what I want to say and I stop here.
     
  9. Okay, now that you’ve all tumblr saviored America’s Pasttime despite my best efforts and probably the names of everyone on the Giants and also the word “giants” so you’re not even reading this post, MISGUIDEDLY, may I appeal to you to get into yet another sports fandom? It is called Katie Baker Comments On The New York Times Wedding Section In Grantland Like It Is Sports News and it’s fabulous.

    • When you read a sentence that so-and-so “led a ceremony that included Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian elements,” it’s always a pretty safe bet that the next line will be ”The couple met at Oberlin College, from which they graduated.”
    • I love how heavy this announcement gets at the end. Just what everyone wants: the story of their love concluding with the detail that the groom’s grandfather “refused to allow Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who had been convicted as atomic spies, to avoid the death penalty when they contended that pretrial publicity had created an atmosphere of prejudice and hostility toward them.” Con … gratulations?

    • Jay-Z or Nas themselves would probably get along well with another groom, Brett Augspurger, whose explanation of his social habits resulted in one of the great lines in “Vows” history:

      “I roll deep,” said Mr. Augspurger, now 32, using hip-hop slang to explain how he found refuge in a group of friends who lived in and hung out at a big house in Berkeley, Calif.

     
  10. image: Download

    longreads:

“How Much Tech Can One City Take?” — David Talbot, San Francisco magazine
More from San Francisco Magazine
     
  11. This is a short true story that I don’t want to spoil, but holy shit is it ever great.

    “Nothing is withheld from us what we have conceived to do.”

    That’s good, who said that?

    God did.

    What?

    God said it and there were only two people who believed it, you know who?

    Nope, who?

    God and me, so I went out and did it.

     
  12. “The expression occupet extremum scabies Acron interprets thus: ‘May he get the itch who comes out last at composing verses’; for, he says, ‘the poet is here speaking metaphorically, drawing his figure from children’s games. For when children are playing at certain running games, they shout! Occupet scabies in extremo remanentem’. Porphyrio and the Commentator Cruquianus give similar explanations. On the basis of none of these could anyone possibly admit, it seems to me, the existence of a deified itch; though it might be allowable to think of it in the minds of the children as a personified itch.”

     
  13. 17:18 30th Jul 2012

    Notes: 7

    Reblogged from joshreads

    Tags: magellanhistorylong reads

    Scarcely had they spoken those words when we heard loud cries and lamentations. We immediately weighed anchor and discharging many mortars into the houses, drew in nearer to the shore. When thus discharging [our pieces], we saw John Seranno in his shirt bound and wounded, crying to us not to fire any more, for the natives would kill him. We asked him whether all the others and the interpreter were dead. He said they were all dead except the interpreter. He begged us earnestly to redeem him with some of the merchandise; but Johan Carvaio, his boon companion, [and others] would not allow the boat to go ashore so that they might remain masters of the ship. But although Johan Serrano weeping asked us not to set sail so quickly, for they would kill him, and said that he prayed God to ask the soul of Johan Carvaio, his comrade, in the day of judgment, we immediately departed. I do not know whether he is dead or alive.
    — Yup, get a weird vibe from the locals, just start shooting artillery into people’s houses and/or abandoning your commander to die on the beach. Anyway, I am writing about Fun History Facts for the Awl, so read to find out about how Magellan’s Expedition was a terrible clusterfuck and/or a war crime! (via joshreads)
     
  14. The Library of Congress discovered this in the 1980s and 1990s, during a long-running project to deacidify old documents. The diethyl zinc reacts with the acid in aged wood-pulp papers, neutralizing it, lightening the color, and stiffening the paper, so you’d think it would be ideal. Well, except for the instant-bursting-into-ravenous-flames part. Making sure that all the reagent was gone before opening the hatch, that was rather important. The pilot plant for this process suffered from some regrettable explosive bonfires before the whole idea was abandoned. Interestingly, one of the biggest problems seems to have been that the treated books were (at least at first) rather odorous, and some colored book covers were initially affected. You can sense a certain testiness about these issues in the Library’s final report on the subject:


    “It has also been established that tight or loose packing of books; the amount of alkaline reserve; reactions of DEZ with degradation products, unknown paper chemicals and adhesives; phases of the moon and the positions of various planets and constellations do not have any influence on the observed adverse effects of DEZ treatment.”

    — further quotes from Things I Won’t Work With
     
  15. 08:40

    Notes: 102

    Reblogged from bigbigtruck

    Tags: chemistrysciencelong reads

    bigbigtruck:

    Scary and fascinating posts about toxic substances on a chemistry blog.

    “It turns out that brutal treatments like, say, touching [titanium tetraazide] with a spatula, or cooling down a vial of it in liquid nitrogen - you know, rough handling - make it detonate violently. I think that staring hard at it is OK, though… [with] goggles, blast shield, face shield, leather suit (!) and ear plugs. “

    “[Ozonides] tend to have a lot of electron density on them, and bonding between them is a careful, arm’s-length affair, sort of like porcupines mating. “

    “You can… distill out the perchloric anhydride (dichlorine heptoxide) if you have no sense whatsoever. It’s a liquid with a boiling point of around 80 C, and I’d like to shake the hand of whoever determined that property, assuming he has one left.”

    My chemistry knowledge is almost nil (college 101 courses are way in the past), but this is still a pretty friendly read. Cool stuff.

    This is really great.

    Not that it’s what you’d call a perfect compound in that regard - despite a lot of effort, it’s still not quite ready to be hauled around in trucks. There’s a recent report of a method to make a more stable form of it, by mixing it with TNT. Yes, this is an example of something that becomes less explosive as a one-to-one cocrystal with TNT. Although, as the authors point out, if you heat those crystals up the two components separate out, and you’re left with crystals of pure CL-20 soaking in liquid TNT, a situation that will heighten your awareness of the fleeting nature of life.